A practical handbook from Feasted
The Field Guide to Conscious Snacking.
The Feasted Guide to Better Snacking. Simple principles for choosing snacks that satisfy, nourish and taste good.
Written by a research scientist who believed you shouldn't have to choose between indulgence and real nutrition.
Five Moments, One Practice.
Each chapter is written to stand alone — read them in any order. Pick the moment you are in.
- The 3pm Slump
- Post-Movement
- The After-Lunch Sweet
- The Meeting Bridge
- The After-Dinner Finisher
- How to Read a Bar's Back Panel
- What We Use & Why
- The Glossary | Words We Use
01
The 3pm Slump
Energy dips, the keyboard slows, the biscuit tin opens. The most universal moment of the day — and the most poorly served.
The Moment
What this looks like
It usually arrives somewhere between half past two and four. The morning's first burst of energy is long gone. Lunch was an hour or two ago. The screen has stopped feeling like progress and started feeling like a wall. You catch yourself wandering toward the kitchen without quite remembering deciding to.
Almost everyone with a structured day knows this moment. The office worker between deadlines, the parent in the brief window before pickup, the freelancer who hasn't moved from the desk since 9am, the medic on a long shift. It is the most universal snacking moment of the day — and, judging by the contents of most office biscuit tins, the most poorly served.
It rarely announces itself as hunger. It announces itself as fog, irritability, a search for distraction. Hunger is the body's framing for it, but the cue you actually notice is cognitive: the inability to hold a thought.
The Physiology
What's happening in your body
Three things are usually unfolding at once. Your post-lunch glucose curve has peaked and is now descending — sometimes gently, sometimes sharply, depending on what lunch was. Your cortisol curve, which is highest in the morning, is at one of its lower points in the early afternoon. Cumulative cognitive load from the morning has drawn down attention reserves, and you may be mildly dehydrated, which mimics the feeling of hunger more often than people realise.
The combination is predictable enough that you could plot it. Lunch ends around 1pm. Glucose peaks around 1:30. The descent begins around 2pm. By 2:45 to 3:15 you are at the bottom of the curve — the lowest blood glucose of the working day. Cognitive performance follows the curve. So does mood. So does patience.
This is real physiology, not a marketing construct. The 3pm dip is a measurable phenomenon, well-documented in the scientific literature, and the body responds to it predictably — by asking, loudly, for something sweet and immediate.
The Default
What people typically reach for
he office biscuit tin. A second or third coffee, this one with sugar. The vending machine chocolate bar that costs £1.40 and contains more emulsifiers than ingredients you recognise. A handful of whatever someone left on the kitchen counter. The "treat" you bought yesterday "for emergencies" and have now finished three times.
The pattern these choices share isn't that they're indulgent — Feasted has nothing against indulgence. The pattern is that they all spike the glucose curve they're trying to fix. The body gets the sugar it asked for; the brain gets thirty minutes of relief; then the curve descends again, lower than before. By 4:30pm you're worse off than at 3pm. By 5:30 you've snacked twice more.
The compounding cost isn't just calorific. The afternoon you spent oscillating between sugar highs and dips is the afternoon you ate three biscuits more than you wanted to, lost two hours of clean thinking, and arrived home with cravings you'll spend the evening fighting.
The Physiology
What to look for in a smarter choice
You're looking for three things working together: protein, fibre, and a small amount of real carbohydrate. The protein and fibre slow the glucose response so the dip doesn't return at 4:30. The carbohydrate gives you the sweetness the brain is actually asking for, so you don't keep looking.
Practical criteria: ingredients you recognise. Portion-controlled, so one snack doesn't roll into three. Low glycaemic, ideally. No sugar alcohols, which solve the calorie problem but create a different one. Nothing that requires you to read a chemistry textbook to understand the back panel.
The simpler the formulation, the easier it is to predict how your body will respond to it. Real food is more predictable than engineered food. Engineered food can be useful — but transparency about what's in it matters more than the cleverness of the engineering.
How Feasted Fits This Moment
12g of plant protein. 7g of fibre. Real chocolate.
The protein and fibre flatten the glucose response — the dip doesn't return at 4:30. Date paste delivers real sweetness without the spike. The real cocoa butter chocolate coating gives you the dessert signal that office biscuits are trying, and failing, to provide.
197 kcal per bar. One bar, one moment. By design.
"I was in the lab and my 3pm was eating me alive. So I built the bar I needed."
Harshita · Founder & Formulator
02
Post-Movement
After a workout, a run, a yoga class, a school run, a long walk. The recovery window is real — and it's broader than the supplement industry tells you.
The Moment
What this looks like
After the workout, the run, the Pilates class, the long Saturday walk. After the school run done at pace, or the hike that took two hours longer than planned. After your body has done work — any work — and is now asking for something back.
We deliberately don't call this "post-workout." Most of the moments your body is replenishing don't happen in a gym. The audience for this chapter is anyone who moved, not anyone who lifts. The mother walking back from school on a cold morning. The dog-walker an hour from home. The colleague who took the stairs instead of the lift, today and yesterday and the day before. All recovery, all real.
The signals are similar across them: a particular kind of clear hunger, a slight muscular fatigue, a craving for something more substantial than a biscuit but less heavy than a meal. The window is open. The question is what to put in it.
The Physiology
What's happening in your body
The body is in a brief, useful state. Glycogen stores in the muscles and liver have been partially depleted by the activity. Circulating amino acids are being used for muscle repair and adaptation. Blood flow to the muscles is elevated. The hormonal environment — particularly insulin sensitivity — is more favourable to nutrient uptake than at most other times of the day.
There is a window during which protein and carbohydrate are particularly well-used. The window is wider than the supplement industry suggests — the "shake within thirty minutes" claim is more nuanced than it sounds — but it is real. Most authorities now place it at one to two hours, with some flexibility either side depending on the intensity and length of the activity.
Real food does this job as well as isolates for most people, most of the time. The body doesn't know whether protein arrived in a shaker or a bar. It knows whether the amino acid profile is complete, and whether carbohydrate arrived alongside it.
The Default
What people typically reach for
Whey protein shakes that taste like cement and require a clean shaker afterwards. Recovery bars that look like protein bars but contain enough sugar to count as a dessert. Brightly coloured drinks marketed at endurance athletes. Or — most commonly — nothing at all, followed by a too-large meal at the next opportunity and a sugar crash by evening.
The pattern: recovery foods are usually built for the wrong audience, by people optimising for a different goal. Gym-bro nutrition has shaped the entire category for thirty years, and most non-gym movers don't see themselves in it. The mother after a school run doesn't reach for a shaker. The colleague who took the stairs doesn't pull out a whey bar at her desk. They reach for what's nearest — and what's nearest, in most kitchens, is the biscuit tin.
The category has been built around competitive athletes and amateur lifters. The far larger audience of people who simply moved has been mostly ignored.
The Physiology
What to look for in a smarter choice
Acomplete protein source — meaning all nine essential amino acids in usable amounts. With plant proteins this usually requires combining sources; pea and rice together is a clean way to do it. Real carbohydrate for replenishment, ideally not isolated sugar. No artificial fillers. Portion-controlled, because the recovery window is real but small — eating a full meal isn't always the answer.
Equally important: something you'll actually eat. The best recovery food is the one you reach for; the second-best is the one you'd never touch. Taste isn't a luxury here. It's the precondition for the habit forming at all.
How Feasted Fits This Moment
Pea + brown rice protein. A complete amino acid profile.
Pea brings lysine, rice brings methionine. Together they form a complete protein — comparable to dairy or whey in amino acid quality. Date paste replenishes glycogen with real food, not isolated sugar. 197–199 kcal per bar — meaningful, not excessive.
EFSA-authorised: "Protein contributes to the maintenance of muscle mass." That's the claim, and it's the only one we make.
"After my own training, this is what I reach for. Not because I'm a gym person. Because my body actually uses it."
Harshita · Founder & Formulator
03
The After-Lunch Sweet
The chocolate-with-coffee, the biscuit-with-tea, the square of dark chocolate that turns into four. The reflex that says the meal isn't closed without something sweet.
The Moment
What this looks like
You finish lunch. You're not hungry. And yet, somewhere between putting down the fork and standing up, a small voice asks for something sweet. A square of dark chocolate. The last biscuit. The lid of the ice cream tub, lifted "just for one bite." It is cultural, biological, and almost universally underestimated.
The reflex doesn't appear at random. It tends to follow specific meals — anything savoury, anything substantial, anything ritual-coded as a "proper meal." Eat a salad alone and the reflex is quieter. Eat a sit-down lunch with company and it arrives with the cleared plates.
Most of us treat this moment as a failure of willpower. It isn't. It's a completion signal — and trying to suppress it tends to make the rest of the afternoon harder, not easier.
The Physiology
What's happening in your body
The brain interprets the end of a meal partly through taste cues. Many cuisines close meals with something sweet for a reason — it signals that the meal is over. The transition from savoury to sweet is itself the signal, more so than the calories. This is why a square of dark chocolate at the end of lunch can feel more satisfying than another savoury course of equivalent size.
Alongside the cue, there is often a mild blood-sugar request. The protein and carbohydrate from lunch are being absorbed, insulin is rising, and there is a small dip toward the end of the absorption phase. The body is asking for a final, small input to smooth the curve.
There's also an emotional layer: comfort, reward, the small ritual of finishing. Suppressing this reflex doesn't make it go away. It tends to surface, larger, later — usually in the 3pm slump or after dinner. Honouring it small and on purpose tends to work better than fighting it.
The Default
What people typically reach for
The office biscuit. A square of 70% dark chocolate (fine in principle, rarely satisfying in practice). The kids' snack drawer raided on the way past. The ultra-processed mini bar engineered to be eaten in four bites and to demand a fifth.
The dark chocolate square is the most common "responsible" choice — and the one that most frequently turns into four squares. Not because of willpower, but because seventy-per-cent dark chocolate isn't designed for closure. It's designed for connoisseurship. The bitterness invites a second piece for balance. The intensity invites a third for full appreciation. By the fourth piece, the original cue has been met, but the choice has produced more sugar and more calories than was intended.
The same logic applies to "just one biscuit" from a packet. The packet is engineered for four. The one-biscuit closure was always notional.
The Physiology
What to look for in a smarter choice
Real chocolate — meaning cocoa butter, not vegetable-fat compound coating. Mouthfeel that genuinely satisfies, so one is enough. Sweetness that comes mostly from real food sources, not from sugar alcohols that cause bloating two hours later. Portion-controlled — you're looking for closure, not a second meal.
The shape of the choice matters too. A single, self-contained portion is easier to stop after than a tub or a packet. The architecture of the food, not just its composition, decides what you'll do next.
How Feasted Fits This Moment
Real cocoa butter coating. Designed for closure.
The chocolate is real chocolate — cocoa butter, not compound. The sweetness is mostly date and a small amount of monk fruit. The texture is dessert-grade. One bar is the portion. Half now, half later is fine.
Not because Feasted "manages cravings" — that's a claim we won't make. Because the bar was designed to satisfy a specific moment, and the design shows.
"I never wanted to give up the dessert moment. So I built one I could endorse."
Harshita · Founder & Formulator
04
The Meeting Bridge
11am or 4pm. Between meetings. Lunch delayed, skipped, or eaten at the desk in ninety seconds. The snack that buys you the next two hours.
The Moment
What this looks like
You have eleven minutes between calls. Lunch was either skipped, delayed, or compressed into ninety seconds in front of a laptop. The next meeting is consequential — a hiring decision, a difficult conversation, a presentation that matters. You need something that buys you the next two hours of clear thinking.
This is decision-fatigue territory. The professionals running structured, back-to-back days know it well. The barrister between hearings. The consultant between sessions. The clinician between patients. The leader who has, somehow, agreed to four one-on-ones in a row before lunch. Get the snack wrong and the second half of the day costs you twice.
The cue is rarely hunger in the classical sense. It's a slight loss of edge. A small drop in fluency. A first sense that the words aren't arriving as cleanly as they did an hour ago.
The Physiology
What's happening in your body
Sustained cognitive work draws on stable blood glucose. The brain consumes around 20% of the body's energy at rest, almost entirely as glucose, and its tolerance for fluctuation is narrower than most other tissues. When glucose dips sharply — between meals, after a sugar spike, or simply because the morning ran long — patience drops, decision quality drops, irritability rises, and the brain's executive functions become harder to access.
Skipping the snack between meetings often costs more than taking it. It tends to mean overeating at the next meal, eaten too quickly, followed by an afternoon dip that wrecks the rest of the day. The bridge snack isn't optional. The question is what it's made of.
Equally important: what it isn't made of. Caffeine on top of caffeine on top of a glucose crash produces a particular kind of jittery decision-making that anyone who has chaired a meeting in this state will recognise.
The Default
What people typically reach for
A fourth coffee. The vending machine, again. A sugary granola bar that promises "energy" and delivers thirty minutes of it. The kitchen biscuit drawer. Or — perhaps most often — nothing at all, followed by an enormous lunch eaten too fast and a glucose crash at 3pm that lasts until home.
The granola bar problem is worth naming: marketed as "healthy" or "energy," most of them are sugar-and-syrup confections with token oats. The label rarely matches the formulation. The bridge snack should buy you stability, not a second spike to manage.
The other failure mode is the "I'll just power through" decision. It almost always means the next meal is too big, too fast, and too late — and the cost is paid in attention for the rest of the working day.
The Physiology
What to look for in a smarter choice
Portion-controlled. Stable energy release — protein plus fibre, not pure carbohydrate. No crash thirty minutes later. Eatable in sixty seconds while you walk back to your desk. Doesn't require utensils, plates, or focus. Doesn't cause bloating mid-meeting. Tastes good enough that you'll actually reach for it before reaching for the coffee.
The portability matters more than people realise. The bridge snack only works if it's already with you — in the bag, in the drawer, in the pocket of the laptop bag. The kitchen drawer is a place decisions go to lose.
How Feasted Fits This Moment
12g protein, 7g fibre, no caffeine, no sugar alcohols. Eaten in a minute.
The protein and fibre give sustained release — no spike, no crash, no need for a second snack. No caffeine, which means it won't compound the third coffee. No sugar alcohols, so no digestive surprise mid-meeting. Real food the body recognises and uses without drama.
Stable glucose is the goal. We don't claim to "improve focus" — that's a regulated health claim. We do say: stable glucose supports sustained cognitive work, and here's a bar built to keep yours stable.
"When I was running experiments through lunch, this is what I needed at my bench."
Harshita · Founder & Formulator
05
The After-Dinner Finisher
The late-evening sweet pull. The 'just one biscuit' that becomes four. Often the hardest moment of the day to manage — and the most consequential.
The Moment
What this looks like
Dinner is over. Plates cleared. You're on the sofa, the kitchen is closed, the day is winding down — and the kitchen, somehow, opens itself again. Ice cream. Biscuits. The chocolate stash you swore you'd ration. "Just one piece" that becomes four, then six.
It is emotional, end-of-day reward, sometimes pure habit. It's the moment most healthy-snack brands fail. And it's the one where the choice you make affects not just tomorrow's waistline, but tonight's sleep.
The cue is rarely hunger. It's transition — from the structured day to the unstructured evening. From doing things for other people to, finally, doing something for yourself. The food is a placeholder for that transition. Which is why "just eat less" almost never works.
The Physiology
What's happening in your body
Two things matter here. First, evening glucose tolerance is lower than morning glucose tolerance — the same food, eaten at 9pm, produces a different blood sugar response from the same food eaten at 9am. This is due to circadian variation in insulin sensitivity, and it means the evening snack is metabolically more costly than its calorie count alone would suggest.
Second, ultra-processed evening snacks are associated, in observational research, with poorer sleep quality. Real-food evening snacks rarely produce the same disruption. The mechanism is partly the glucose response, partly the additives, partly the fact that ultra-processed foods tend to be eaten in larger quantities than planned.
This isn't about willpower or about earning the snack. It's about what you eat once you've decided to. The decision to eat something has already been made. The work is in choosing what.
The Default
What people typically reach for
Ice cream — and rarely the small bowl that was intended. Ultra-processed milk chocolate. The cereal box, eaten dry from the hand. The "small piece" of cake that turns into a slice. The biscuits intended for the kids.
The common factor isn't sugar content. It's that these foods are engineered to not be enough. One piece of ultra-processed chocolate produces the dopamine signal, but not the satisfaction signal. So the brain asks for another. And another. The architecture of the food is designed for that.
You can spot it on the packaging. Foods designed to satisfy come in single servings. Foods designed to not be enough come in shareable packs, family sizes, "indulgence" multipacks. The shape is part of the design.
The Physiology
What to look for in a smarter choice
Real food, satisfying enough that one is genuinely enough. No caffeine, even small amounts — anything with cocoa solids alone matters here, particularly for sensitive sleepers. Doesn't spike the glucose curve, because the evening one is more sensitive. Doesn't disrupt the wind-down. Tastes indulgent enough to feel like a treat, not a compromise.
And — critically — the right portion. The decision to stop is much easier when the food itself decides for you.
How Feasted Fits This Moment
Real chocolate. No sugar alcohols. Portion-controlled by design.
Rich, indulgent, portion-controlled. No caffeine. No sugar alcohols. No ultra-processed crash. The real cocoa butter chocolate gives the closure signal. 197 kcal — a finisher, not a meal.
We won't tell you Feasted "helps you sleep better." That's a sleep claim, and we don't make those. What we will say: ultra-processed evening snacks are associated with poorer sleep. Feasted is built differently. Draw the line yourself.
"The after-dinner moment is where most healthy snacks fail. I designed for this one hardest."
Harshita · Founder & Formulator
06
A Reference Piece · Consumer Education
How to Read a Bar's Back Panel
The five things to look for, and the seven things to walk away from. A short guide to reading any protein, snack, or chocolate bar — not just ours.
The back of a snack bar tells you more than the front ever will. The front exists to seduce you. The back exists because the law required it. The asymmetry is honest — but only if you can read it.
This is a short guide to reading the back panel of any protein, snack, or chocolate bar — not just Feasted's. The vocabulary is industry-standard. The tricks are industry-wide. Once you can read one panel, you can read all of them.
The Anatomy
What you're actually looking at
Every UK food back panel contains four standard elements: the Nutrition Information panel (numbers per 100g and per portion), the ingredients list (in descending order of weight), the allergen statement (with allergens in bold), and any regulated nutrition or health claims (which must follow specific authorised wording).
The marketing copy on the front isn't regulated the same way — which is why it's where most of the misdirection lives. What you're learning to read is the relationship between the front and the back. If they don't say the same thing in the same vocabulary, the bar has something to hide.
The Five Tells of a Well-Built Bar
What to look for
01
A named protein source
Not protein blend. Not protein matrix. The actual source — pea, whey, milk, soy, hemp — listed on the back, in plain English. If the front says high protein but the back lists three sources you can't identify, the brand is either hiding the cost engineering or the allergens.
02
Ingredients you recognise
The shorter the list, the easier the audit. Twelve or fewer ingredients, all recognisable as food, is a reasonable upper bound. Sunflower lecithin is fine. E471 alone is not. Numbers aren't always bad — a panel mostly composed of numbers is one designed to be hard to read.
03
Fibre from real food
Fibre is good. Fibre from chicory inulin, oats, almonds, dates — recognisable. Fibre from polydextrose, soluble corn fibre, or IMO is technically fibre but functionally a bulking agent designed to inflate the fibre count on the front. The body doesn't always process them the same way.
04
Real chocolate
Look for cocoa butter in the ingredients of any chocolate-coated bar. If the coating is real chocolate, cocoa butter will appear. If it's compound coating — cheaper, waxier, less satisfying — you'll see vegetable fat, palm fat, or just vegetable oil instead. The front of the pack will rarely tell you which.
The Seven Red Flags
What to walk away from
01
“Vegetable fat” as the coating
The polite name for compound coating. Tells you the chocolate isn't real chocolate. Tells you the brand chose cost over experience.
02
Sugar alcohols driving the low-sugar number
Maltitol, sorbitol, xylitol, erythritol, lactitol. They reduce the sugar count without losing sweetness. Many people experience bloating, gas, and digestive discomfort from them — particularly in the doses used in low sugar bars.
03
“Soy protein isolate” as the lead protein
Used because it's the cheapest complete protein available. Often heavily processed. A protein source by every legal definition, but a poor one if you're choosing for ingredient quality.
04
Palm oil — by any name
Sometimes listed as palm fat, palm kernel oil, or just vegetable oil. Cheap, plentiful, environmentally costly. There are legitimate sustainable palm sources — but few find their way into snack bars.
05
“Natural flavourings” without specifics
A catch-all category. Can legally include hundreds of compounds. If the brand can't tell you what's actually in their natural flavouring, it's usually because the answer wouldn't help them sell the bar.
06
Synthetic fibres dressed up as wellness
Polydextrose, IMO, soluble corn fibre. Used to inflate the fibre claim on the front. Some research suggests they don't deliver the same gut benefits as real-food fibre. Common in bars marketed at a wellness audience.
07
More than fifteen ingredients
A loose heuristic, but useful. The more ingredients, the more likely the bar is engineered around a marketing claim rather than around being a piece of food. There are exceptions. There are not many.
The Marketing Tricks
What the front wants you to think
"Source of protein” / “high protein.” EU regulations: 12% of energy from protein = source of; 20% = high in. Both are legal claims. Neither tells you whether the protein is complete, or in usable quantity for your goals.
“No added sugar.” Doesn't mean no sugar. Doesn't mean no sweeteners. A bar can be no added sugar and still contain 12g of sugar from dates plus five sugar alcohols.
“All natural.” Not regulated in the UK. Means whatever the brand wants it to mean.
“Plant-based.” Useful information. Doesn't tell you which plants — or how heavily processed they were before they ended up in your bar.
“Real ingredients.” Meaningless without specifics. Every bar contains real ingredients. The question is which ones.
A Small Ritual
Read the back, then decide
Not the front first. Not the price first. The back, deliberately, with intent. It takes ninety seconds. Most of the time the answer is obvious. The other times it's worth the ninety seconds anyway.
The practice doesn't make you a difficult customer. It makes you a clear-eyed one. The bars built to be read are the ones that don't mind being read. That is, in the end, all you're testing for.
APPLY IT
Next time you pick up a bar — yours, ours, anyone's — turn it over before you look at the price. The back is where the brand tells the truth it didn't put on the front.
07
A Reference Piece · Ingredient Deep-Dive
What We Use & Why
An ingredient-by-ingredient walk through the back panel. The reasoning we used to choose each one — and what we deliberately left off.
A short brief: the bar had to taste like dessert, not like a supplement. The protein had to be complete and usable. The chocolate had to be real chocolate, not compound coating. The sweetness had to come mostly from real food. No sugar alcohols, no soy isolate, no palm oil, no compound coating, no natural flavourings code we couldn't explain. The portion had to be small enough that one bar was the moment.That brief eliminated about 95% of the formulations available off the shelf. What's left is below, ingredient by ingredient, with the reasoning we used to choose each one.
The Ingredient List
What's in the bar
01 Pea Protein Isolate
What it is
Protein extracted from yellow split peas. High in lysine, moderate in most other essential amino acids, low in methionine.
Why it's here
A clean, allergen-friendly, complete-when-paired protein source with a long safety record. Pea protein has been a workhorse of the plant-based supplement industry for fifteen years, and the manufacturing has matured to the point where it dissolves cleanly into a bar without the gritty texture that defined early plant proteins.
What it replaces
Whey (not vegan), soy isolate (over-processed, heavily refined, allergen), rice protein alone (incomplete amino acid profile).
02 Brown Rice Protein
What it is
Protein extracted from whole-grain brown rice. High in methionine and cysteine. Low in lysine.
Why it's here
To complete the amino acid profile. Pea protein's lysine pairs with rice protein's methionine to form a complete profile — all nine essential amino acids in usable amounts. This is what makes the combined protein comparable, in amino acid quality, to whey or dairy. Most plant-based bars use a single plant protein source, which is not complete.
What it replaces
The second helping of pea protein that would otherwise be needed (and would still leave the bar incomplete).
03 Dates
What it is
Pureed dried dates, with no added sugar.
Why it's here
Real-food sweetness with a substantially flatter glycaemic response than refined sugar. Dates contain natural sugars (mostly glucose and fructose) bound in fibre — the fibre slows the absorption. The result is sweetness that satisfies without producing the sharp peak-and-crash of cane sugar or syrup. Dates also contribute texture, mouthfeel, and a small amount of fibre.
What it replaces
Cane sugar, glucose syrup, brown rice syrup, agave, honey (not vegan), and every sugar alcohol on the market.
04 Monk Fruit Extract
What it is
A sweetener extracted from the monk fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii), used in small amounts.
Why it's here
A clean, non-caloric way to lift the sweetness above what dates alone can provide, without resorting to sugar alcohols. Used sparingly — in the smallest amount that delivers the intended dessert-grade sweetness, not as the primary sweetener.
What it replaces
Erythritol, stevia (off-tones in finishing), maltitol, sucralose.
05 Real Cocoa Butter Chocolate Coating
What it is
Chocolate coating made with cocoa butter as the fat. The kind of chocolate that snaps, has a Form V crystal structure, and melts at body temperature.
Why it's here
Because compound coating doesn't deliver the satisfaction signal that real chocolate does. The melt profile of cocoa butter is the difference between feeling like you've eaten chocolate and feeling like you've eaten a bar that wished it was chocolate. This is the single most expensive ingredient decision in the bar. Worth it.
What it replaces
Compound coating, palm-fat-based coatings, anything labelled vegetable fat.
06 Cocoa Solids
What it is
The non-fat solids of the cocoa bean — what gives chocolate its colour, flavour, and a portion of its functional properties (small amounts of caffeine, theobromine, flavanols).
Why it's here
Alongside cocoa butter, to make the coating recognisably chocolate. We source where the supply chain can be traced — not perfectly, but better than the industry default.
What it replaces
Cocoa-flavour compounds, heavily alkalised cocoa designed to compensate for cheaper beans.
07 Almond & Peanuts Fibre Blend
What it is
Real-food fibre from almonds and peanuts, contributing both soluble and insoluble fibre. 9g per bar.
Why it's here
Derived from food, not from synthetic bulking agents. Soluble fibre slows glucose absorption (supporting the post-prandial response described in Chapter 1). Insoluble fibre supports digestive regularity.
What it replaces
Polydextrose, soluble corn fibre, IMO, fibre blend without disclosure.
What's deliberately NOT here
The ingredients we left out, and why
Sugar alcohols
Maltitol, sorbitol, erythritol, xylitol, lactitol. They solve the calorie problem. They create a digestive one — bloating, gas, discomfort, particularly at the doses used to make bars low sugar. Many of our customers told us before launch that they'd given up on the healthier-snack category specifically because of sugar alcohols. We listened.
Soy protein isolate
The cheapest complete protein available. Heavily processed. Allergen. The ubiquitous workhorse of the budget protein-bar category. We chose pea-plus-rice
instead — more expensive, cleaner, just as complete.
Palm oil or any seed oils
Cheap, plentiful, environmentally costly. Sometimes labelled as vegetable oil or palm kernel oil. Even sustainable palm has supply-chain ambiguities we'd rather avoid.
“Natural flavourings”
A catch-all category that can legally include hundreds of compounds. If we use a flavour, it's named. If we can't name it, we don't use it.
Compound coating
The cheaper alternative to real chocolate. Looks like chocolate. Doesn't deliver the satisfaction signal real chocolate does. Worth paying more for the actual thing.
Artificial sweeteners
Aspartame, sucralose, acesulfame K. All legal. All technically safe. All read as engineered food rather than real food. We chose the latter framing.
The Trade-Offs
The compromises we didn't make
Real ingredients cost more. The bar is more expensive than the £1.30 supermarket protein bar. There isn't a way to make it less expensive without using one of the ingredients listed above. We have chosen not to.
The portions are smaller than the headline bars. A 55g bar with real ingredients fills you up more than a 70g bar engineered to be eaten in three bites. We have chosen the smaller, denser, more satisfying portion.
The chocolate isn't 70% dark. Dessert-grade chocolate is in the 30–45% cocoa range. We have chosen indulgence over connoisseurship. The 3pm slump doesn't want a connoisseurship moment. It wants chocolate.
APPLY IT
If an ingredient is on the back panel, we can explain why. If we can't explain why, it isn't on the back panel.
08
The Glossary
Words we use
Short definitions for terms that recur across the chapters. Cross-linked from every section that uses them. A living document — new entries appear as new chapters add them.
Amino acid
The building blocks of protein. Twenty exist; nine are “essential” — meaning the body can't synthesise them from other compounds and must obtain them from food. The completeness of a protein refers to whether it contains all nine in usable amounts.
Authorised health claim
A claim formally approved by EFSA and legally permitted on packaging or in marketing in the UK and EU. Authorised claims have specific wording requirements; using them with even slightly different language can fall outside compliance.
Cocoa butter
The naturally occurring fat in cocoa beans. The structural component that gives real chocolate its snap, melt, and signature mouthfeel. Solid at room temperature, liquid at body temperature.
Complete protein
A protein source that contains all nine essential amino acids in usable amounts. Most single plant proteins are not complete on their own — but combinations (legumes plus grains, e.g. pea plus rice) can be
Compound coating
A chocolate-style coating made with vegetable fat instead of cocoa butter. Cheaper to produce, structurally different from real chocolate, noticeably less satisfying on the tongue. Common in mass-market "healthier" bars.
EFSA
European Food Safety Authority. Maintains the official register of authorised health claims for food products in the UK and EU. References to EFSA-authorised claims appear throughout the Field Guide where ingredient functions are discussed.
Fibre, prebiotic
A type of dietary fibre that nourishes beneficial gut bacteria. Common sources include chicory root inulin, oats, almonds, and certain fruits and vegetables. Different from probiotics, which are the bacteria themselves.
Glucose tolerance
The body's ability to manage blood glucose after a meal. Varies through the day — typically higher in the morning, lower in the evening — and varies between individuals. Mechanism is partly hormonal (circadian variation in insulin sensitivity).
Glycaemic response
The pattern of rise and fall in blood glucose after eating. Influenced by carbohydrate type, protein, fibre, and what else is eaten alongside. Lower and flatter is preferable for stable energy.
Glycogen
The body's stored form of glucose, held primarily in the liver and muscles. Depleted by physical activity; replenished by dietary carbohydrate. The basis of the recovery window concept.
Monk fruit
A small green melon (Siraitia grosvenorii) native to southern China. Its juice contains compounds called mogrosides that taste roughly 200–300x sweeter than sugar, with no caloric contribution. Used in Feasted in small amounts as a sweetness lifter.
NHCR
UK Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation. The legal framework governing what food and supplement brands can claim about their products. Applies to food, not only supplements. The reason the Field Guide is careful about its wording.
NOVA classification
A food categorisation system developed by researchers at the University of São Paulo. Groups foods by degree of processing. NOVA 4 — ultra-processed — covers most mass-market snack bars, sweetened cereals, and packaged baked goods.
Postbiotic
The beneficial compounds produced when probiotic bacteria ferment prebiotic fibres. Increasingly recognised as a meaningful contributor to gut health — and unlike probiotics, they don't require live bacteria to remain stable in food.
Post-prandial
“After a meal.” Used to describe the metabolic responses that follow eating — most notably the rise and fall of blood glucose. The post-prandial dip is one of the physiological drivers of the 3pm slump.
Prebiotic
A type of dietary fibre that selectively nourishes beneficial gut bacteria. Common sources: chicory inulin, oats, certain fruits and vegetables, garlic, onions. Different from probiotics (the bacteria themselves) and postbiotics (the compounds bacteria produce).
Probiotic
Live beneficial bacteria, typically delivered through yoghurts, fermented foods, or supplements. Not all probiotic products on supermarket shelves contain live bacteria by the time they're consumed — storage and processing matter.
Sugar alcohol
A class of sweeteners (maltitol, sorbitol, erythritol, others) used to reduce sugar content. They count as carbohydrates but are largely not absorbed — and many cause bloating and digestive discomfort. Feasted uses none of them.
Ultra-processed
A category defined by the NOVA classification: foods made largely from extracted substances and additives rather than whole foods. Linked, in observational research, to a wide range of poorer health outcomes.
Subscribe for newsletter
A supporting statement for your value proposition to encourage customer to complete your CTAs

